Comments on: No money for Obama from public financing or lobbyist ,will McCain get more lobbyist money for smear adds? http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/ Increase good credit business in smart ways Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:51:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: elmjunburke http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/comment-page-1/#comment-218 elmjunburke Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:36:48 +0000 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/#comment-218 Obama used his dirty tricks again . He said that he would accept public funds that would limit how much a candidate could spend . After McCain accepted the public funds , Obama went back of his promise . Obama doesn't want to be limited on how much he can spend . His friends have more money than they know what to do with. Obama has many donors . They all wear a diaper on their heads , held on by a couple of fan belts . Do you really believe that Demicraps do not use smear "adds" ? Obama used his dirty tricks again . He said that he would accept public funds that would limit how much a candidate could spend . After McCain accepted the public funds , Obama went back of his promise .
Obama doesn’t want to be limited on how much he can spend . His friends have more money than they know what to do with.
Obama has many donors . They all wear a diaper on their heads , held on by a couple of fan belts .
Do you really believe that Demicraps do not use smear “adds” ?

]]> By: dewcoons http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/comment-page-1/#comment-217 dewcoons Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:20:03 +0000 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/#comment-217 I think it is funny how things go around in cycles. I am old enough to remember when all candidates used only donor money to run. But people felt that left them open to the influence of lobbiest, big donors, etc. So a system of public financing for elections was invented to keep politics clean. Only now it has been decided that the public money is the "dirty" stuff, and the "clean' politician is the one who rejects that and goes back to the private donors. It is just so ridiculous. Face the facts. There is only ONE reason a politician would refuse money. He thinks he can get more elsewhere. If Obama takes public money, he is limited in which he can collect elsewhere. Right now it appears he will get more money if he goes "private", so he rejects the public money. Has nothing to do with run a "cleaner" campaign. It has to do with running a "richer" campaign - more money. Oh---the 527s do NOT get public money. Whether a candidate takes or rejects public money has absolutely nothing to do with 527s, which are ads run by people BESIDES the candidates, with no input or approval from the candidates, and no money from the candidates. I think it is funny how things go around in cycles.

I am old enough to remember when all candidates used only donor money to run. But people felt that left them open to the influence of lobbiest, big donors, etc.

So a system of public financing for elections was invented to keep politics clean.

Only now it has been decided that the public money is the “dirty” stuff, and the “clean’ politician is the one who rejects that and goes back to the private donors.

It is just so ridiculous.

Face the facts. There is only ONE reason a politician would refuse money. He thinks he can get more elsewhere. If Obama takes public money, he is limited in which he can collect elsewhere. Right now it appears he will get more money if he goes “private”, so he rejects the public money.

Has nothing to do with run a “cleaner” campaign. It has to do with running a “richer” campaign – more money.

Oh—the 527s do NOT get public money. Whether a candidate takes or rejects public money has absolutely nothing to do with 527s, which are ads run by people BESIDES the candidates, with no input or approval from the candidates, and no money from the candidates.

]]> By: alion300 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/comment-page-1/#comment-216 alion300 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:41:00 +0000 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/#comment-216 While I have supported Obama,I find it disturbing that he has reversed his position in order to accept private donations while McCain continues to accept public financing. Private donors will all be asking for favors and special treatment in the future. Also, someone spending his way to the Presidency is contradictory for someone who says he wants to bring a new approach to politics. While I have supported Obama,I find it disturbing that he has
reversed his position in order to accept private donations
while McCain continues to accept public financing. Private
donors will all be asking for favors and special treatment in
the future. Also, someone spending his way to the Presidency is contradictory for someone who says he wants
to bring a new approach to politics.

]]> By: tx_trotter95 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/comment-page-1/#comment-215 tx_trotter95 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:44:17 +0000 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/#comment-215 What are you babbling about? Your second sentence makes absolutely no sense. So, taking donor money is somehow "cleaner"? Hasn't the liberal mantra been that we needed publicly funded election campaigns? BTW, the Swiftboat veterans were right - how's Frenchie's lawsuit coming along? What are you babbling about? Your second sentence makes absolutely no sense. So, taking donor money is somehow “cleaner”? Hasn’t the liberal mantra been that we needed publicly funded election campaigns?

BTW, the Swiftboat veterans were right – how’s Frenchie’s lawsuit coming along?

]]> By: sizlim http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/comment-page-1/#comment-214 sizlim Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:31:30 +0000 http://buildingcreditbusiness.com/elections/no-money-for-obama-from-public-financing-or-lobbyist-will-mccain-get-more-lobbyist-money-for-smear-adds/#comment-214 what's an add, some kind of ad? what’s an add, some kind of ad?

]]>